Efforts underway to persuade Mercosur governments to protect international use common food names

November 30, 2017 – The Washington DC-based Consortium for Common Food Names (CCFN) today reports that “Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Paraguay must protect the interests of their local food producers and respect current international standards by rebuffing European Union (EU) efforts to confiscate common food and beverage names.

Black Forest Ham

This was the message sent to the Mercosur nations yesterday by the CCFN, which has been sounding the alarm this year to governments from China and Japan to Mexico – and now in South America – about the EU’s recent, systematic attempts to abuse geographical indications (GIs) protections. CCFN filed its letter as part of a brief comment period provided during the course of the EU-Mercosur negotiations.

Specifically, CCFN highlighted a number of common names that Mercosur nations risk giving away to the EU as part of its current trade negotiations: asiago, black forest ham, bologna, brie, camembert, chorizo, edam, emmental, feta, fontina, gorgonzola, gouda, grana, gruyere, manchego, mozzarella, mortadella, parmesan, pecorino, prosciutto, provolone, romano, pancetta and salami. CCFN also objects to EU efforts to claim sole ownership of common wine terms such as sherry, chablis and port.

“We oppose any new restrictions, including GI registrations, on the use of [these] commonly used terms of importance to Mercosur’s trading partners and domestic food industry,” the letter states, describing the “colonial-like dominance” the EU is attempting to exert in pushing for these economic restrictions that short-change local producers and consumers. At the same time, CCFN notes, the EU is denying New World countries access to the EU market for foods that carry internationally recognized generic names, such as “parmesan” and “feta”.

CCFN does not oppose the EU’s protection of legitimate compound terms like “Mortadella Bologna”, “Mozzarella Di Bufala Campana” and “Prosciutto Toscano”, the letter states. However, restrictions on the use of common names, such as “bologna”, would “clearly constitute defacto nontariff barriers to trade and as such be entirely incompatible with the existing World Trade Organization (WTO) commitments of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay.”

“A decision to impose a blockade on common name products from the United States, Australia, New Zealand and other Mercosur trading partners will not be taken lightly, particularly given the current focus on holding countries to account for trade violations,” the letter states.”

Comments are closed.